Wednesday, 27th November 2002, 10:12pm
An opinion by:
Nette 
Many Lives, Many Masters by Brian L. Weiss
Okay, here's more anecdotal evidence of reincarnation, as told by a psychiatrist who is surprised and skeptical when a phobic patient regresses
way way past her childhood during a hypnotherapy session. She has been unresponsive to conventional treatment and releasing the trauma of her various past lives (there are eight-six in total) nearly instantly cures her. Now, if you read a series of reincarnation books in rapid succession, like I've just done (eg. Jenny Cockell's
Across Time and Death), it is hard not to be convinced. Besides, most of world already knows about it, right?
What is fun about this adventure is that we have the psychiatrist protesting like Scully to the patient who is our Mulder. This story, which is by its very nature told backwards, still somehow manages to be suspenseful, even when Weiss himself is bored by the past life tales and just wants to get to the good bits - conversations with the spiritual masters that come through when Catherine, the patient, is in between lives. Once we get past the gender bias of the term (sheesh), the masters seem to provide easy to understand insights into other planes of existence. You can't help wondering how much this model is structured so that Weiss can understand it. The whole thing makes spiritual life and the journey of the soul sound suspiciously like university, but hey, maybe they were just using terminology they knew he'd relate to and could convey easily, right? After all, his academic credentials are apparently crucial to adding weight to the story - you know the argument, smart very educated guy who knows better than everyone believes so it must be true. That's right, he's a master, so don't be telling him it is all a lie!
Despite all the boys - uhm, I mean, masters - the story is well-written, perhaps because much of it is transcribed from the actual hypnosis sessions, and the long-suffering Catherine has an excellent sense of narrative. Makes me squint at people near me now and wonder which ones I've known before.
Readers have left 5 comments
how is that in some places the period as told by the patient is referred to BC. the years of BC are known after Christ is born. So no year can be remembered as BC.
please clear my doubt
the book is a very good one and I learnt a lot and it is helping in my day today life and approach to them. I am trying to get guided by my forefather spirits. I think also now that in many instances of my difficulty they only must have guided me out of those.
thanx
divakar